Re: mapping of C-z

[...] RT> Let me cast my vote for leaving it as it is. :-) RT> I also find it *way* annoying when I accidentally hit C-z instead of RT> C-x and my emacs window is gone and I'm now typing into something RT> else. Well, I wouldnt have minded as much if the mapping was simply undef-ed. But changing it drastically is something I didnt expect. Imagine how much more annoying C-z is now for YOU yourself, when you accidentally type 'C-z v v' instead of 'C-x v v'. Instead of just iconifying and making you *think* it crashed, it actually deleted everything upto the next 'v'. And zap-up-to-char doesnt wait for RET either. It just does it. And its not like C-z mapping changed in the same major release, ie from 21.5.x to 21.5.y. We have had the same mapping for years now. Changing something like this, in general, is not good. RT> For casual users, I would think this is confusing too. Hey! Where RT> did emacs go? It must have crashed again, damnit! RT>:-) RT> Ray kaarthik