Karl Kleinpaste writes:
Could anyone explain this to me?
XEmacs has needs for special treatment of some options, and our users
(including ourselves) are consistently unable to determine whether a
particular option should be a "--with" option or an "--enable"
option.
So we've written code to process our special options and to recognize
"with" and "enable" as equivalent on *all* options.
The autoconf people have decided that danger of users getting totally
bogus results because of unrecognized typos in option names is high,
so they now helpfully warn on any option that was not declared with an
Autoconf Approved[tm] macro.
It appears to have understood not one of the options it was given.
Actually it understands all of the options, but it pretends it doesn't
know *any* of them. One of these days we'll get around to spoofing
the Autoconf Seal of Approval[tm], but in the meantime the easiest way
to disable the warning is to re-autoconf with Autoconf 2.61. I
probably should add that to my release script, actually. :-(
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta