Re: [Success] XEmacs 21.5-b9 "brussels sprouts" (+CVS-20021117) i586-pc-win32

Hi Ben, no, this is not a new problem. It has been around in 21.5 and 21.4 for a long time. Stephen put in a workaround for 21.4 which probably isn't the right solution for 21.5. Best regards, Adrian >>>>> "Ben" == Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com&gt; writes: Ben> ----- Original Message ----- Ben> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; Ben> To: <xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org>; <ben(a)xemacs.org&gt; Ben> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:07 PM Ben> Subject: Re: [Success] XEmacs 21.5-b9 "brussels sprouts"

Ben> i586-pc-win32 >> >>>>> "APA" == Adrian Aichner <adrian.aichner(a)teradyne.com&gt; writes: >> APA> Following bug still exists: >> >> [...] APA> call-interactively(dired) >> >> So you get this if you just do `M-x dired RET', right? (I'm going see >> if I can cook up a tests/automated for it.) >> APA> mule-tests.el: 227 of 232 (97%) tests successful. >> >> This is not good. Ben? Ben> did this just change? it's hard for me to imagine my changes Ben> affected mule in any way. Hi Ben, no, this is not a new problem. It has been around in 21.5 and 21.4 for a long time. Stephen put in a workaround for 21.4 which probably isn't the right solution for 21.5. Best regards, Adrian Ben> ben >> >> >> -- >> Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences

>> University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba

>> Ask not how you can "do" free software business; >> ask what your business can "do for" free software. >> -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/