* Nelson Ferreira <nelson.ferreira(a)ieee.org> writes:
Michael, I think that idea of implementing the dbusbind.c as a
dbusbind.el on top of ffi-dbus.el (or not, since like SY said, it
is very early), is valid.
I for one would like to see it.
Yes, I support this idea. Michael, if you'd like to help us do this,
then probably the first thing you should do is have a look through our
SPPM, especially the VC and patches sections...
http://www.sxemacs.org/docs/sppm/Version-Control.html#Version-Control
http://www.sxemacs.org/docs/sppm/Patches.html#Patches
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| SXEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------------<steve(a)sxemacs.org>---|
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta