Re: New package system design draft

dv> sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes: dv> But is it possible for a package to require dv> another one ? Like, in gnus you would have (require-package w3 <spec). dv> Typo. I meant suppose that a package requires another package (not dv> only one feature of this package) with a particular specification, hence it dv> would be nice to have something similar to you require-package-feature, but dv> for the whole package itself: I still don't understand. What's the meaning of "to require another package (not only one feature of this package)" operationally? -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla