Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:06:45PM -0500, Ben Wing wrote:
>i imagine the time is doing font lookups. are you using stephen's xft?
>
>
Not in these tests.
>is your x server on a slow network connection?
>
>
Nope, local. Full xlsfonts is 0.36s for 12K fonts.
well, try using some utility to see what the X server traffic is. (i'm
sure there's some such utility but i'm not sure what)
>as for init-mule-at-startup, what is the value of
>`load-unicode-tables-at-dump-time'? if nil, it's maybe not too
>surprising that it takes some time, as it's loading all the unicode
>tables. if t, however (which is the default), these were already loaded
>at dump time, and retrieved using pdump, so the slowness would be strange.
>
>
nil, no idea why since it's vanilla source except for my time
instrumenting. In any case these tables being unchanging should be at
C level and linked in.
duh. it's only true on windows-nt. i think this is because it's really
necessary there, but i was afraid of the executable bloat (about 700K)
on other platforms. change the default in unicode.el and this will make
it be dumped.