Zhang Wei,
Thank you for the info on emacs-unicode2!
I'm looking into XEmacs, and does these unicode changes apply to XEmacs as
well?
Regards,
Tsun
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Zhang Wei wrote:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
writes:
[...]
> The emacs-unicode2 branch of GNU Emacs is well-recommended for
> stability and character set support if those are overriding concerns.
> But that branch is of course completely unsupported, currently not
> being developed AFAIK (they're devoting maximum effort to the current
> release) and is basically waiting on the release to be merged to
> mainline, at which point you can probably expect some months of
> instability. (And as far as I know all emacs-unicode developers are
> Unix-based; I've seen no reports about it on Windows. It's *probably*
> OK but I suggest asking before you invest effort.)
Development of emacs-unicode-2 branch of GNU Emacs is not so active as
the cvs head. But tiny changes still apply to it every now and
then. And It continues to sync with HEAD every week or so.
emacs-unicode-2 can be complied for Windows with some effort. The
tips(in Chinese) could be found at:
http://www.emacs.cn/Doc/Win32Compile
A precomplied emacs-unicode-2 for windows could be found at here:
ftp://web433702:n2f0w3b5@ftp.fff21.com/www/koocyton/emacs/ntemacs23_2006_01_20.tar.bz2
--
Zhang Wei or Brep
<brep(a)smth.org>