Re: bitkeeper integration?

n> Now that bitkeeper (www.bitkeeper.com) has *finally* a public n> release, has anyone looked at integrating support into vc? As a bitkeeper user, I can tell you that vc already works (sort of). vc thinks that there's sccs underneath. Bitkeeper creates necessary symlinks for commands like get, admin, edit... There is one bug, though, where vc invokes the sccs admin command in a way that bitkeeper's admin command doesn't like. So when you press C-x v v on a non source control file (ie, a new one) it fails and you'll have to run "bk new" yourself. All this'll be easier once the vc update hinted at earlier this week happens (I'm hoping there's a better abstraction layer on the underlying source control system).