On May 25, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Michael Albinus wrote:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> Nelson Ferreira writes:
>
>> Indeed. GNU Emacs currently does not (at the best of my knowledge)
>> support FFI.
>
> And won't. RMS is adamant on that point. It came up in an ongoing
> thread, and he once again insisted that (with current technology)
> dynamic loading of binaries into Emacs is not acceptable.
I do not speak about using FFI in GNU Emacs.
D-Bus in GNU Emacs consists of dbusbind.c, dbus.el, and dbus.texi
[1]. I
was thinking of writing a dbusbind.el for [S]XEmacs, reimplementing
its
Lisp exported objects via ffi-dbus.el. dbus.el and dbus.texi could be
left untouched in the best case (in practice, it might be necessary to
change them as well, for example due to concurrent definitions in
dbus.el and ffi-dbus.el).
Michael, I think that idea of implementing the dbusbind.c as a
dbusbind.el on
top of ffi-dbus.el (or not, since like SY said, it is very early), is
valid.
I for one would like to see it.
--Nelson
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta