I've given the `cond' special form the r{4,5}rs scheme-style `=>'
syntax. It's working, when the test code is run interpreted, but not
when run byte-compiled.
Attached is the simple test code followed by my first C code patch to
XEmacs. (not counting typos in docstrings or comments.)
My question is: Should the byte compiler be compiling `cond' like
that, since it's in C already? Wouldn't it run faster if it only
translated things like the anonymous lambda, and left the rest for
the C code to run?
#include <nerdy/any_ideas.h>
1998-04-27 Karl M. Hegbloom <karlheg(a)inetarena.com>
* eval.c (Fcond): Support scheme-style `=>' syntax.