Re: lazy-lock-after-change

Jerry James writes: I can't say "obviously correct", but it seems very plausible to me that changes that are basically about analysis of the buffer should come "late" in the after-change list, since they would be incorrect if any code makes changes. I don't see any reason why font-locking code would make changes to the buffer (other than font-lock-specific text properties recording the analysis), so theoretically this is the right change. Since it works in practice, even though it seems this is a distro- specific issue, I say +1 Steve _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta