Re: 21.0 vs 21.2
Martin Buchholz writes:
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew O Persico
<mpersico(a)erols.com> writes:
Matthew> Is 21.2 a CVS-only, or are there tarballs? I am
Matthew> working on an NT machine and it will be a few weeks
Matthew> before I get my Linux box back to where I could try
Matthew> using CVS. But then, I'd nead a tarball to start
Matthew> from anyway since rematerializing a whole CVS tree
Matthew> over 56K line is probably too slow, yes?
Check it out at
ftp://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/xemacs/beta/xemacs-21.2
I recommend CVS, though.
I recommend the tarballs. We still need people to install XEmacs
using the tarballs and report problems. There are recurring
problems with inappropriate files being included in the tarballs,
bad file permissions, missing files and so on. The tarballs are
how we package the product for the user and therefore they must
to be tested.