Re: [patch] enable unload-module
|--==> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)arsdigita.com> writes:
Hrvoje> "Andrew Begel" <abegel(a)eecs.berkeley.edu> writes:
>I've tested this change, and it works.
>
>The logic here is that when a dynamic module is unloaded, we can't have
>any hope of unloading the lisp symbols that were defined.
Hrvoje> Then why unload the module in the first place?
Doesn't the term "dynamically loadable module" usually imply that the
module can also be unloaded?
Is this not the case with XEmacs?
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 9E7E2820>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|