From: Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 09:12:35 +0000 (GMT)
`Breaking stuff for folks that already have things working right'
isn't the worst thing that can be done. It certainly shouldn't be done
gratuitously, but I don't believe that this is the case here.
. . .
I agree with virtually everything in your message. However, your
message doesn't seem to address that, if you don't change the defaults
to having a non-Control-D-delete-forward-binding, you avoid a huge
class of `Breaking stuff for folks that already have things working
right', i. e. you can fix what's broke without fixing what ain't
broke.
Rick