Ralf Angeli <angeli(a)caeruleus.net> writes:
* David Kastrup (2007-03-13) writes:
> Ralf Angeli <angeli(a)caeruleus.net> writes:
>
>> * David Kastrup (2007-03-13) writes:
>>
>>> Finding out _who_ put that strange copy-syntax-table there for _what_
>>> reason should be easy for an XEmacs developer with CVS access.
>>
>> Could have been copied from Emacs 21.
>
> I doubt it.
Well, the call to `copy-syntax-table' is in the sources of Emacs 21.
> Can't check the Emacs CVS, however, since Savannah is
> down.
What do you need CVS for? `grep-find' did it for me.
2003-02-20 Stefan Monnier <monnier(a)cs.yale.edu>
* subr.el (with-syntax-table): Don't copy the table any more.
Unless nobody checked this using Emacs 21.4, it would then appear that
`copy-syntax-table' behaves indeed differently in XEmacs 21.5 and
Emacs 21.4. Which of the two would be correct, I have no idea. But
the call to `copy-syntax-table' seems like a mistake, anyway, and I am
surprised that we got no complaints from Emacs 21 users yet.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta