Re: Gnus 5.10.2 in released packages
On 26 May 2003, Stephen J. Turnbull <- stephen(a)xemacs.org wrote:
>>>>> "Karl" == Karl Pflästerer
<sigurd(a)12move.de> writes:
Karl> Hi, did someone try Gnus 5.10.2 with XEmacs 21.5.12 or
Karl> 21.5.13? Especially the rfc2047 encoding of subject or from
Karl> header lines?
One of these days....
I would really like to help finding that bug. But I'm absolutely not
sure where to search.
Karl> It seems to work with 21.4.x.
Good enough.
Right.
Karl> Why did it get released?
Whyever not? Supporting 21.5 is not a critical function of the
packages. Rather, it's the other way around: if a package doesn't
work with 21.5, we presume 21.5 is broken.
Fair enough. At the moment I have no clue if it's a bug in 21.5 or a
bug in rfc2047.el which first could be seen in 21.5.
bye
Karl
--
If you have nothing to say on a subject, replying with a line such as,
"I agree with this." puts you in the TO:'s for all future messages, and
establishes you as "one who really cares", if not an actual expert, on
the topic at hand. -- from the Symbolics Guidelines for Sending Mail