At 01:58 PM 6/21/2002 -0700, David M. Karr wrote:
Well, I'm not certain. If the output of
"list-processes" really shows all of
your sub-processes, then I was probably still under 64. I probably had 52-53
processes. However, I'm a little uncertain exactly what entries in that list
signify. I had thought that if I execute '(kill-process
"WWW<72>")' it would
directly kill that process. However, this gives me an error indicating "no
such process" (I don't remember the exact error message). So, either the
"Proc" column doesn't represent a process name you can send to
"kill-process",
or many of those entries don't represent real processes.
I guess it would be helpful to know if its a particular type of process
that causes the problem or the number of processes or a combination of both.
andy