Re: sync auctex 11.84: good news.
>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Mats Lidell writes:
> Hi Uwe, You wrote:
>
Uwe> What exactly is the state of art. Can Mats submit that
Uwe> Xemacs.rules patch?
>
> I think I need to produce a patch with better documentation for it to
> be accepted. Maybe also look at it again to see whether it can be done
> in a better way.
I think the best thing at this point is to just get the whole thing
into CVS where people and the Package Build Smoketest can easily look
at it. As long as you CVS tag the current state, it's trivial to
recover by reverting the changes.
That all looks reasonable to me. However I prefer if the Xemacs.rules
patch is applied before I submit the big auctex patch.
Uwe
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 306 bytes)