>>>> "nix" == nix <nix(a)esperi.org.uk>
writes:
nix> (an exception's thrown during auto-autoloads reading). It
nix> probably breaks other stuff but I wasn't going to go hunting
nix> with an XEmacs that wouldn't start. :)
Urk. Failure of auto-autoloads should _not_ prevent XEmacs from
starting. But that's not what I came to talk about today....
nix> It seems to me that it's valid programming practice to have a
nix> fires-now instantly-repeats itimer, because the itimer
nix> function might reset its own repeat period to something else.
OK, but does your patch really implement F-N I-R, or just a very close
approximation on systems that are running sanely?
What really makes sense here?
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences
http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.