I think Michael is spot-on in his statements here.
I see Stephen's point about the implementation, and I support his
right to make these kinds of decisions for this release.
I look forward to all of us trying to improve the implementation of
this feature for the next release.
- vin
sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes:
>>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic
<hniksic(a)arsdigita.com> writes:
Hrvoje> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes:
>> Not for the release. The rules have changed. I've explained how
>> this is going to work. The Release Manager says "no", and unless
>> the Review Board overrules, the veto rides.
Hrvoje> We never agreed to these rules. You're inventing them as you go
Hrvoje> along.
I don't think so. The way I remember it, Stephen was quite explicit
about this aspect of the whole thing well in advance. Incidentally, I
agree, even though Stephen did veto one or two things *I* wanted in
the release.
Hrvoje> Even Ben didn't dare do that.
We're not talking about code not making it into XEmacs in general,
we're talking about code not making it into this specific release, for
which Stephen has accepted significant responsibility.
I'm sure he has no objections against putting it into the
soon-to-be-opened development branch.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla