Re: does not work
(NOTE how terrible small the hebrew font is. This does not occur when
gtk is disabled.)
I have yet to delve into how pango picks its fonts. This is handled by
PangoFontSet. How we're going to expose that in lisp is going to be a
problem.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> wrote:
>> "Jeff" == Jeff Sparkes <jsparkes(a)gmail.com>
writes:
> You're right. I just compared to FSF emacs.
> It's displaying differently, but not correctly.
> Sorry for the confusion.
Well it depends with which version of GNU emacs you compare, 23 has no
BIDI support 24 has, although I am not sure whether it is in mainstream
or just in git.
I attach two screenshots of the same file
one with xemacs, (compiled with
/configure '--with-mule' '--with-optimization'
'--without-error-checking' '--with-toolbars' '--with-xpm'
'--with-xface'
'--with-gtk'
(NOTE how terrible small the hebrew font is. This does not occur when
gtk is disabled.)
The other screenshot is with GNU emacs 24.
So Aidan, pango is of no help?
Uwe Brauer
--
Jeff Sparkes
jsparkes(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta