Re: hg diff --subrepos

Mats Lidell writes: > >>>>> Michael Sperber <sperber(a)deinprogramm.de&gt; writes: > > > That's dangerous, as it doesn't necessarily give you the > > *consistent* set that Norbert is managing. > > Yes if you mix up doing a consistent pull with doing a pull on all > subrepos. So in that sense onsub might be evil since it makes that > error easier to make. As I wrote before, it's not an error (bug). The problem is that an onsub pull gives you a workspace with *no consistency guarantees at all* in our current workflow. What we're trying to work out here is "what consistency guarantees should we provide to the smoke test?" Not to mention, Norbert. :-)