RET ain't RET unless you tell RET it is RET (was: [Success] XEmacs 21.5-b12 "carrot" i386-unknown-freebsd4.8)

|--==> "SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: viteno> Hi! Could someone please remind me what's the objective viteno> of binding RET to C-m instead of C-j unconditionally? viteno> This reduces the usability within an xterm to some value viteno> close to zero. SJT> Anyway, what I'm seeing is the opposite: CR is getting translated SJT> to LF somehow in an xterm. Here's a really ugly ugly work around, and I have no idea why it works, but it does so go figure... - Fire up 'xemacs -nw' - In scratch _before_ you do or touch anything else type: (describe-key "\C-m") C-j anywhere near the return key. BTW, Ben introduced this bug about a year ago with one of his workspace commits. I have asked time and again to get this fixed. Free beer to whoever fixes this. -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| | XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. | | Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! | |------------------------------------&lt;youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt;---|