My first attempt got spam-trapped...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Vin Shelton" <acs(a)alumni.princeton.edu>
Date: Dec 28, 2008 10:36 PM
Subject: xemacs-base now required to build
To: "XEmacs Beta" <xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org>
Greetings -
In the process of generating the 21.4.22 release, I realized that the
xemacs-base package is now required to build xemacs-21.4, because of these
lines in lisp/autoload.el:
(defvar autoload-make-autoload-operators
'(defun define-skeleton defmacro define-derived-mode define-generic-mode
easy-mmode-define-minor-mode easy-mmode-define-global-mode
define-minor-mode defun* defmacro*)
"`defun'-like operators that use `autoload' to load the library.")
(defvar autoload-make-autoload-complex-operators
'(easy-mmode-define-minor-mode easy-mmode-define-global-mode
define-minor-mode)
"`defun'-like operators to macroexpand before using `autoload'.")
easy-mmode comes from xemacs-base, and if you try to build xemacs-21.4
without an xemacs-base package, you get this error:
Building finder database ...(done)
rm -f lisp/auto-autoloads.el
/home/acs/xemacs-21.4-2008-12-28/src/xemacs -batch -no-autoloads \
-l autoload -f batch-update-directory lisp
Cannot open load file: easy-mmode
xemacs exiting
.
make: *** [lisp/auto-autoloads.el] Error 255
21.5 doesn't have this problem because there's a copy of easy-mmode.el in
lisp.
What do you think is the right solution to this? Should we accept the
limitation that xemacs-base is required in order to build 21.4 and document
it somehow in INSTALL? (... patches welcome). Should I copy a version of
easy-mmode.el into lisp/? (Yuck)
Please send your thoughts to the list.
Regards,
Vin
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta