Re: Perl embedding: trial balloon
John Tobey <jtobey(a)channel1.com> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> wrote:
>
> jari.aalto(a)poboxes.com (Jari Aalto+mail.emacs) writes:
>
> > We only need to take a look at the number of people that are
> > supporting Perl modules compared with the number of people
> > supporting Emacs lisp modules (and programs) and it's easy to
> > calculate ratio of 50:1. Check traffic in perl groups vs. Emacs.
> >
> > If we had Perl as extension language, a vast number of potential
> > programmers might step in.
>
> Thanks, but: no thanks.
Luckily, you have the option to say that. Why not let others say
thanks but no thanks to Lisp?
I'm not forcing anyone to use XEmacs.
Also not that I said "thanks, but no thanks" to Jari Aalto's ＠$##＠$
arguments related to newsgroup traffic and number of modules, not to
you.