Re: ?????
Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes:
What are we supposed to do with this ? I don't even know the
message
it's referring to. How does the robot detect patches ?
Didier, what exactly do you find wrong with the message? To me it
looks clear, informative and polite. The robot was unable to find a
patch in the message, and will forward it to the human moderator who
will decide if it's really a patch or a spam (or whatever).
I'm a member of this list, and I know `wonderworks', so
it's
ok. However, I honestly think that if I were an occasionnal patch
sender, receiving back this kind of /very friendly/ message would
probably discourage me from contributing anymore :-/
Now I don't understand what you're talking about. Did you have a bad
day, or am I missing something really basic?
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Try to use "ad nauseam" at least once per flame. It doesn't mean
anything; but it gives that polished feel to your postings.