Re: ben-mule build failure report.
Stephen J. Turnbull writes:
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Pittman
<daniel(a)rimspace.net> writes:
Daniel> I have tried to build the ben-mule branch today and
Daniel> encountered a problem in the build process. This is Debian
Daniel> Linux 3.0:
CC reports of bugs in that branch to ben(a)xemacs.org. Ben typically
lags by a week or more in reading xemacs-beta.
Ben's the only one who has a good idea of what's going on in that
branch right now.
is ben subscribed to the build reports list as well ??
i have been having trouble getting his branch to compile on FreeBSD
i sent a build report with "[Failure ben-mule]" in the subject
it seemed like the best subject to use
hey i just had a thought
would it be useful to have the branch added to the SUCCESS|FAILURE
header for the subject ? and maybe the major options like GTK and MULE ?
it would make sorting build reports a bit easier
what do people think about this ?
if anyone is interested i could have a go at a patch for build-report.el
--
XEmacs Advocate | Do not try the patience of Wizards,
FreeBSD Devote | for they are subtle and quick to anger.
Perl Hacker | - Elric (Technomage) , Babylon 5.
Apache God | <mailto:rendhalverï¼ xemacs.org>