Re: bug? `define-derived-mode' doesn't set `derived-mode-parent' property
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 12:23, John Paul Wallington wrote:
> Synch of missing features for derived.el would probably be
acceptable
> for 21.4, and a general synch might very well be. Please carefully
> note any changes in semantics in describign patches recommended for 21.4.
I don't really use it, although I don't mind synching it. Ville, is a
general synch the best strategy ?
I haven't really looked too deep into it, but generally, I'd try to do
it in a way that at least doesn't cause any more (unnecessary)
divergence.
--
Ville Skyttä
ville.skytta at xemacs.org