>>>> "John" == John A Turner
<turner(a)blueskystudios.com> writes:
>>>> "MS" == Michael Sperber
<sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>:
MS> So, erhm, *is* there process output at this point? I.e. has the ls
MS> completed and is there a prompt?
John> the whole xemacs frame was blank and unresponsive - repeated C-g's did
John> nothing
So just how exactly did you create the automated bug report?
John> eventually just killed the proc and got the backtrace in the shell window
John> I'd started xemacs in
So it really seems as if there's a bug with the handling of process
output, and with C-g. I've long suspected that, since I keep getting
a thin trickle of non-reproducible or unanalyzable bug reports. (One
recent VM bug report also suggested this.)
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla