Please reply to the mailing list, not to individuals. XEmacs is a
_team_, and the individual who responds first is often not the person
best suited to continue the thread.
Also, please don't use HTML-only mail. It's only because I'm a
perfectionist that it doesn't go straight to the bit-bucket; in the
XEmacs context, we get literally thousands of spams a week in that
format, and maybe one or two legit posts a month. You will experience
delays and dropouts if you post in that format.
Matthew> Thanks. I can't believe I forgot to add in my previous
Matthew> email: I am running Cygwin. Cygwin uses lesstif in place
Matthew> of(?) Motif (but I think you know this).
Yes, it's detected by configure and noted in Installation.
Matthew> Cygcheck shows: "lesstif
Matthew> 0.93.94-2." Presumably this is later than the 0.93.36 you
Matthew> mention below. So how might I verify whether the patch
Matthew> you also mention was included in 94-2?
Ask the Lesstif people or the Cygwin people. The patch from PROBLEMS
simply rips out the finalization, equivalent to cutting off your
finger to remove a splinter; I would assume that an actual fix would
involve a lot more work.
Matthew> Please clarify what you mean by "your OS's section". Section
of what?
The PROBLEMS file that is distributed with XEmacs. I'm not sure
whether Cygwin installs it, it's part of the source distribution.
Some of that information may be in the FAQ (see the Help menu, XEmacs
FAQ option, or the links to documentation on
http://www.xemacs.org/),
however the FAQ is organized differently from PROBLEMS.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences
http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.