Re: xemacs-package for VM 8.0.8
Robert Widhopf-Fenk <hack(a)robf.de> writes:
But taking a look at the package of gnus I started to modify
it to match the layout of upstream which simplifies syncing
a lot.
Are such changes o.k.?
Yes. (By me at least.) The easier it is for you, the better---just as
long as the package infrastructure works correctly for your code, and
that seems to be the case.
The list of provides in "package-info.in" has to be
updated
by hand if I am correct?
I think so.
Also I bundle a newer version of vcard.el with vm, than the
one provided by the gnus package. How are such duplicates
handled? IMHO it would be better to have vcard.el in another
package required by the packages which need it.
Are the two versions compatible?
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta