Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Aaaaaarrgh!!!! I was ready to release 21.5.24 (tarballs are already
built), but I guess I'll wait for Ben to weigh in on this.
Rick> I have no idea whether or not this is the right thing to do,
Rick> but it works for Cygwin.
AFAICT xemacs.def is Cygwin-specific, so I guess it's the right thing
to do.
Why do we need a separate file like this? I thought this was
precisely the kind of thing that inlines.c was intended to handle.
Would it be possible to deal with this in the same way (ie, #include
all the headers into xemacs.def with some preprcessor magic to extract
the needed symbols)?
i don't completely understand what's going on here; but i think your
suggestion of auto-generating as much of this file as possible is
exactly the right thing. however, it's gonna take some work to get this
right; so i'd suggest for the moment that you apply rick's patch.
ben