Re: for 21.4? regex fix [Re: regular expression question]
Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com> writes:
> If so, that should be documented.
that won't work. [and according to perl, \010 is a ^H!]
Maybe it should. Emacs is not Perl -- for instance, in Emacs,
(re-search-forward "\\n") searches for "n", not for newline.