Re: That gutter again
On Tue, 01 Feb 2000 09:54:31 +0100, Jan Vroonhof said:
Note that the idea was for the "customize" variable to be
the one that
holds the specifier. That was why the :set and :get stuff is there.
For some reason there all these blab-bla-p placeholders that shouldn't
be there.
However I suggest we stop worrying about this until the gutter API is
more or less stable.
What set me off ranting was use of a specifier for toolbars. The more
generic issue of using specifiers instead of -p variable is one that
needs to be resolved, no matter WHAT the gutter API is doing.
/Valdis