At Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:36:33 +0900,
Stephen J. Turnbull <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
I recommend that you either make this the primary version for ports
now, or after one or two more releases. 21.4.4 is scheduled for
Monday, mostly MS Windows-related changes, and there will be a 21.4.5
in about 4 weeks, depending on some annoying bugs in the text syntax
module used for fontlock, etc. 21.4.5 is likely to be the first
release or 21.4 designated "stable".
Does it means that current gamma one is substantially `stable' and
present ports-current's editors/xemacs21* ports should be changed up
to 21.4.*?
If this doesn't answer your question, I'll be happy to
clarify any
unclear points.
I want to know that it is meaningless or not both `stable' and 'gamma'
exist in FreeBSD ports-tree -- in other words people who uses
XEmacs-21.1.14 from reasons for expecting reliability should not be
change to XEmacs-21.4.3?