You are right, thanks for catching this - debugging this one would
have been very tricky.
david
Lionel Fourquaux writes:
I can be wrong, but something looks strange in your patch.
> +#ifdef USE_KKCC
> + pt.x = XBUTTON_DATA_X (EVENT_DATA (eev));
> + pt.y = XBUTTON_DATA_X (EVENT_DATA (eev));
^
Is this duplication correct, or do you mean XBUTTON_DATA_Y?