Re: auctex preview.dvi build failure
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
David Kastrup writes:
> It would appear that you change the files around in order to fit
> XEmacs. [...] I have good cause that such changes are clearly
> marked as not being the responsibility of upstream.
You have no legal grounds at all.
Shrug. I just love the way XEmacs treats upstream.
That's reasonable, as a feature request. It will be implemented
much
faster if you supply a patch, since nobody here seems to understand
what's going on with that code at all, while you attest that it's not
onerous for you.
If you don't plan to supply a patch, your request is less likely to
get lost if you file a feature request on the tracker:
http://tracker.xemacs.org/
I am neither XEmacs developer nor user and I won't register at the
websites of all people that think cooperation and courtesy towards
upstream is for wimps.
Sorry, I have neither time nor inclination to work for the benefit of
people that consider my contribution to their work an aggravation.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta