Re: shadowing of unicode.el, mule-ucs vs. core

Joachim> /opt/xemacs/lib/xemacs/mule-packages/lisp/mule-ucs/unicode hides Joachim> /opt/xemacs/lib/xemacs-21.5-b24/lisp/unicode Joachim> Is this intended? More or less. $srcdir/lisp/unicode.elc gets dumped into the binary, so the shadow should not be a problem in practice. Joachim> Ain't I read somewhere that mule-ucs is irrelevant for Joachim> 21.5.24 anyhow? Yes. You can remove the package if you are exclusively using XEmacs Joachim> PS: Is it normal that bug reports don't appear at Joachim> xemacs-beta, two days after I've sent them? Maybe because Joachim> some of them had attachments? No, it's not normal. The spam filter didn't like your host's name, which appears in the Installation file. Fixed. Everybody: if you experience a delay of more than 6 hours, it's probably the spam filter. Please report to xemacs-mailmaint(a)xemacs.org. BTW, upgrading Tux's spamassassin will not make it unnecessary to maintain our own filters; I have a recent spamassassin on my workstation, and it still passes about 45% of the spam caught by our extra filters. In any case there are folks like Joachim who need to be whitelisted, but whitelisting on "From" is not necessarily appropriate. -- School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.