Re: 21.5.33, specifier.c and the x-symbol patch

Uwe Brauer writes: #<font-specifier global=( ((tty) . "normal") ((x) . "-*-courier-bold-r-*-*-18-180-*-*-*-*-*-*") ((x) . "-adobe-symbol-*-*-*-*-*-240-*-*-*-*-*-*") ((encode-as-utf-8 initial x x-coverage-instantiator) . "-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-7") ((initial two-dimensional x) . "-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-7") ((initial two-dimensional x) . "-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-7") ((initial two-dimensional x) . "-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-7") ((final one-dimensional x x-coverage-instantiator) . "-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-7") ((final two-dimensional x x-coverage-instantiator) . "-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-7") ((x) . "*")) fallback=( ((tty) . "normal") ((x) . "-*-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-*-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-*-*") ((x) . "-*-*-medium-r-*-*-*-120-*-*-c-*-*-*") ((x encode-as-utf-8 initial x-coverage-instantiator) . "-misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso10646-1") ((x two-dimensional initial) . "-*-*-medium-r-*-*-*-150-*-*-c-*-*-*") ((x two-dimensional initial) . "-*-*-medium-r-*-*-*-160-*-*-c-*-*-*") ((x two-dimensional initial) . "-*-*-medium-r-*-*-*-170-*-*-c-*-*-*") ((x one-dimensional final x-coverage-instantiator) . "-misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso10646-1") ((x two-dimensional final x-coverage-instantiator) . "-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-140-75-75-c-90-iso10646-1") ((x) . "*")) 0x47> (#<charset ascii "ASCII" "ASCII" "ASCII (ISO646 IRV)" 94 l2r cols=1 g0 final='B' reg=[iso8859-1] 0x0> . initial) #<x-device on ":0.0" 0x2> nil nil) The second argument (#<charset ascii ...> . initial) is correct according to the API, so I assume the problem is with the patch. That patch was always the wrong thing to do, and I have never promised to maintain it. I gave you a patch to x-symbol years ago that should have made x-symbol work with an unpatched XEmacs. Maybe it's time for you to dig that out and take fixing x-charset (which is abandoned as far as I know, and so not a good reason to change XEmacs) seriously. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta