Re: Basic package question

andy> At 09:59 AM 5/6/98 -0400, \"Zow\" Terry Brugger wrote: andy> Following up to you and Itay: andy> You shouldn't put your package path underneath the lib/xemacs-21.0-b3? dir. andy> The whole point of packages is that they move at a different rate (more andy> slowly hopefuly) to the core distribution thus you should be able to run andy> XEmacs 22.0 against 21.0 packages. Thus you should install in a directory andy> that is failry version independant. This is basically correct. However, we have provided for a version-specific packages hierarchy so that potentially, version-dependent packages can have a home. Currently, we have none. Unfortunately, we have---because of the read-time macro fuckage---architecture-specific packages. There's no provision for those, and I'd like to keep it that way. -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla