Re: GPLv3 status
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Mats Lidell <matsl(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
I don't think there has been any activity since the big job you
did
yourself, at least I haven't noticed anything but I hope to be proven
wrong.
I also thought you had the best knowledge yourself about the state
through the "GPL version 3 source survey" and the mails you have sent
to different developers asking for their permission to go GPLv3 or
later. So what do you think?
Before the summer I got the impression that we ought to be rather
close to be able to do a switch. So I was just about to ask nearly the
same question myself: What is left and what can we do about it?
I had the impression that Ben had tied up the loose ends I left
dangling, and that what we needed was a new release with the new
license terms in place. If that's so, then I'd guess that our release
manager is overburdened. Stephen, is that a correct assessment of how
things stand? If so, is there some way I can take some or all of the
burden off your shoulders?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta