"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>>>>> "APA" == Adrian Aichner
<adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
APA> Stephen, can you please take the time to specify what you
APA> mean by "broken" and what by "do the right thing"?
APA> - What happened.
Files (mostly Releases/x.y.x.html) that didn't need validation got
validted, files that did need validation (index.html,
Releases/index.html, Releases/21.5.27.html) did not get validated.
This has been going on for years, I've reported it several times,
there is no rhyme or reason that I can determine to which files get
validated, even after removing all the .htmls.
APA> - What you thought should have happened.
The files that were updated by make all (see above) should get
validated.
APA> - Precisely what you were doing at the time.
Running "make validate" after running "make all" after editing the
.content files corresponding to the files I expected to get updated.
Thanks, Stephen, I'll take a look.
This is exactly the info I wanted.
I thought I had fixed a few issues with the xemacsweb/Makefile you had
reported over time.
More later,
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrianï¼ xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org/