Re: [VETO] Revert buffer patch
Andy Piper wrote:
> yup, that's exactly what my original proposal concerned.
>
> are you in agreement with it?
Your original proposal concerned optimizing away after-revert-hook, I still
don't see
how that jives with what I am trying to achieve.
what are you trying to achieve? i explained how to optimize away
after-revert-hook and after-change-hook. this should eliminate all slowness
you're complaining about.
andy