Re: GPLv3 packages?

Stephen> I think we could probably convert the packages wholesale to Stephen> GPLv3 even if XEmacs itself is still GPLv2. I would prefer that. Stephen> We'd also have problems doing maintenance on them for XEmacs, Stephen> I suspect. Ie, changes in them to make them work better with Stephen> GPLv2 XEmacs would undoubtedly get a claim that these aren't Stephen> separate works, but rather derivative of XEmacs. That is true but if the goal is to make XEmacs GPLv3 too and we show that we are working on that I hope some migration period surely would be acceptable. Stephen> We also need to coordinate the whole thing with SXEmacs. What is the position of the SXEmacs project on GPLv3? Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta