>>>> "Karl" == Karl Kleinpaste
<karl(a)justresearch.com> writes:
Karl> Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> When help conflicts with deleting backwards, deletion has to
win,
> since it is the more important operation, and f1 is available on
> almost all ttys for getting help.
Karl> Wow. That's an incredibly aggressive assumption. The fact that F1
Karl> exists has next to no relation to whether it is available. For me, my
Karl> entire set of Fx keys is bound to an assortment of random xterm
Karl> functions via Xdefaults; none of Fx generates a standard character
Karl> sequence that gets to the application running in the xterm. That is,
Karl> if one wishes to discuss "more important operations," I consider the
Karl> ability of my xterm to provide font-switching, personalized canned
Karl> character sequences, and selection insertions to be far more important
Karl> operations than having two flavors of character deletion, a capability
Karl> I don't recall ever having wanted.
I'm sorry, but your desire to only ever delete text in one direction
puts you in a rapidly shrinking minority. It is the goal of
configurable software like XEmacs to make users like you happy, but
not without some effort on your part to change the default behavior.
It is of course your perfect right to run your xterm in non-standard
fashion. However, if you do so, you have to accept responsibility for
informing your applications of your changes. You cannot expect your
applications to work out of the box with the function keys that you
have.
Note that if you have TERM=xterm, and you have changed the sequences
sent by your function keys, you are lying to your computer. The
`proper' thing to do is for you to create your own terminfo/termcap
entry `xterm-karl' and set up your accounts to use this terminfo
entry. It is not likely you will actually want to do this work, but
tty applications might actually work with your function keys if you
did. For just XEmacs, you can frob function-key-map.
Martin