Re: Address for W3 bugs
Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>> For XEmacs, every package has a PACKAGE-bugs(a)xemacs.org
mail alias.
Hrvoje> Yes, but if that points to a list that noone reads, it's
Hrvoje> not of much use, is it? I didn't want to mail to
Hrvoje> w3-bugs(a)xemacs.org (or something like it) precisely
Hrvoje> because I have no idea where that alias points to and
Hrvoje> whether anyone maintains the very alias!
Let's fix those aliases!
You still have access to these aliases, BTW, right?
I do not fully understand your question. To clarify, I was trying to
make two different points:
* I'm not sure if W3 is maintained at all. If so, the sources and the
README files should be updated to reflect an address to report bugs.
* I am reluctant to use the PACKAGE-bugs(a)xemacs.org alias because I
don't know where it points to (EXPN is typically disabled by modern
mail servers). Additionally, I don't know if these aliases are
being well maintained in general, which furthers my distrust in
them.
I'm all for fixing the aliases, but it won't address my concerns, one
of them being related to W3 development, and the other reflecting a
personal choice of mine.
>> It doesn't do a good job at rendering
http://www.xemacs.org/ either
>> :-(
Hrvoje> Maybe www.xemacs.org should be fixed. :-)
If you tell me what's broken about http://www.xemacs.org, I will try
to fix it.
Well, it doesn't render well in W3. :-)
I assume you were kidding, since I put considerable effort in making
our site content compliant to XHTML 1.0 Transitional.
For the record, yes, I was kidding.