Re: BUG: apropos.el/hyper-apropos.el hate C++

ms> Of course, string syntax for regexps (especially the fucked-up ms> mess that calls itself "Emacs regexps") should be one of the ms> First Things Against The Wall When The Revolution Comes. This And all this time I'd been thinking that it was the fact that Emacs was Lisp-based that was the reason we glory in the regexp syntax. I'd always wondered why the name of the language wasn't "LUDB" (Lots of Uninterpretable Doubled Backslashes).... ms> is Lisp, after all, not sed or awk or Perl. That sounds like a reason *not* to have a sensible syntax for regexps....