Re: packages with binaries
Stephen writes:
default). I'm talking about the internal structure. No matter
how
much functionality you load into a program, you can't make it easier
to maintain and modify. That requires refactoring.
It seems to me there is quite a bit of refactoring going on.
I have mixed feelings about this: firstly, it breaks my add-ons
that rely on internal structure (well, there was no documented api,
was there?), secondly Uday likes Common Lisp, which is an alien idiom
to me, so makes everything hard to read.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta