Re: [V21.5] test-harness.el to log results when run noninteractive

|--==> "JJ" == Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: JJ> Steve Youngs <youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt; wrote: SJT> Neither of which is acceptable for the beta release manager. JJ> I have to admit that I'm not up on Australian slang. We got it from the yanks. JJ> Where I come from, though (the exotic foreign country of JJ> nearly-Southern California), this is a mortal insult. Precisely why I used it. JJ> I think Stephen is right, so it is disturbing to see you reply JJ> in what appears to be an insulting way, rather than offering a JJ> reasonable response. So here's a "reasonable response" for you: I am an incredibly busy person who has very little time for anything. Because of that I make decisions very quickly. That usually means ignoring things that I don't consider important. As the 21.5 release manager the 21.4 tree has low (note I didn't say "no") importance, but I do keep an eye on it. Windoze has _never_ given me any reason to apply even the slightest amount of importance to it. I can't ever see that situation changing. Couple those facts with the fact that I honestly believe with every ounce of my being that the worst mistake the XEmacs project has ever made was to support windoze and you should soon understand why I ignored a thread about windoze on 21.4. JJ> I hope I mistook your intent. I hope you didn't. -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| | XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. | | Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! | |------------------------------------&lt;youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt;---|