On 12.11.99 at 17:10, Kyle Jones <kyle_jones(a)wonderworks.com> wrote:
Yah, this is the place, historically speaking.
And, historically speaking, 640K ought to be enough? :-)
Not arguing either way; just nitpicking. It struck me as odd is all. If a
patch breaks something, the sane thing to do is to bitch at whomever
touched the patch last not the one who came up with the idea. I'm probably
just not familiar enough with what goes where and how these things are
tracked and should probably have kept my mouth shut in the first place. :-)